AI · PRODUCTION SYSTEMS Own infrastructure · GDPR compliant

AI that survives contact with real operations.

Most AI pilots die between the demo and the department that has to use them every morning. We build the boring parts — data access, evaluation, fallbacks, audit logs — so the interesting part actually stays in production.

// delivery profile AI PRACTICE
Pilot duration4–8 weeks
Model optionsopen-weight / API
HostingEU · own datacenter
Data processingGDPR compliant
Evaluationon your own data
Code ownershipyours, day one
RAG ON PRIVATE DATA DOCUMENT-TO-DATA OCR & EXTRACTION CLASSIFICATION & ROUTING COMPUTER VISION PRIVATE MODEL HOSTING EVALUATION & GUARDRAILS EU AI ACT READINESS RAG ON PRIVATE DATA DOCUMENT-TO-DATA OCR & EXTRACTION CLASSIFICATION & ROUTING COMPUTER VISION PRIVATE MODEL HOSTING EVALUATION & GUARDRAILS EU AI ACT READINESS
Our position

We are not selling you a model. We are selling you a working process.

The models are a commodity — anyone can call the same API you can. What decides whether AI produces value in your company is everything around it: which data it can reach, how errors are caught, who reviews what, and whether anyone measured the result against the manual baseline.

Why pilots stall

  • No measurable baseline. Nobody recorded how long the manual process took or how often it erred, so “better” stays an opinion.
  • The data is not reachable. The knowledge lives in scanned PDFs, an ERP without an API and three people's inboxes.
  • No plan for being wrong. A demo that is right 85% of the time is impressive; a payroll process that is right 85% of the time is a liability.
  • Nobody owns it after launch. Models drift, documents change format, and an unmaintained system quietly degrades.

How we work instead

  • Measure first. We build an evaluation set from your real cases before writing production code, and agree the accuracy threshold in advance.
  • Solve the plumbing. Connectors, OCR, normalisation and indexing are the actual project; the prompt is the last five percent.
  • Design for failure. Confidence scores, source citations, human review queues and full decision logs are built in, not added after an incident.
  • Operate it. Monitoring, re-evaluation on new data and a support line to the team that wrote the code.
Capabilities

Six things worth automating with AI.

Each of these has a clear before-and-after you can measure in hours saved or errors avoided. If a use case does not have that, we will tell you before you spend a budget on it.

Assistants on your own data

Retrieval-augmented assistants that answer from your contracts, procedures, technical documentation and historical tickets — with citations back to the source paragraph, so answers can be verified rather than trusted.

Document-to-data automation

Invoices, delivery notes, contracts, technical sheets and scanned forms turned into structured records in your ERP or database — including handwriting-heavy and badly photographed originals from the field.

Classification & routing

Incoming tickets, emails, claims and applications sorted, prioritised and routed to the right team automatically, with the uncertain minority escalated to a person instead of guessed at.

Computer vision on field evidence

Photo-based verification for installation, production and inspection work: detecting missing components, reading nameplates and serials, and flagging defects in images your crews already take.

Private model hosting

Open-weight models running on STOREWEB infrastructure in the EU, so sensitive documents never leave hardware we operate. No per-token exposure of confidential material to third parties.

Governance & compliance

Data flow mapping, retention rules, decision logging, human-in-the-loop checkpoints and the technical documentation required where the EU AI Act applies to your use case.

Engagement

Small, measured, reversible — then scaled.

We would rather prove one workflow works than sign a transformation programme. If the pilot does not clear the threshold, you stop with a small bill and a clear answer instead of a large bill and a maybe.

01 / SCOPE

Use case & baseline

We pick one workflow with real volume, measure how it performs today and define the accuracy and time targets that would make automation worthwhile.

  • Workflow and data-source mapping
  • Evaluation set from your own cases
  • Written success criteria and risk classification
02 / PILOT

Build & evaluate

A working system on real data within weeks, scored against the evaluation set at every iteration, with the cost per processed item calculated openly.

  • Data pipeline, OCR and indexing
  • Model selection and prompt or fine-tune iterations
  • Measured accuracy report, not a demo video
03 / OPERATE

Production & monitoring

Integration into the systems your teams already use, with review queues, alerting on quality drift and periodic re-evaluation as your documents and processes change.

  • Integration with ERP, CRM or internal tools
  • Human review workflow and audit trail
  • Ongoing monitoring and re-evaluation
Principles

What we will and will not do.

Your data stays yours
We do not train shared models on your material, and every data flow is documented before it is built.
DPA
A human stays accountable
Decisions affecting people, money or safety route through a person. AI proposes; your process approves.
HITL
Numbers, not adjectives
Every claim about accuracy comes with the evaluation set it was measured on and the cases where it failed.
EVAL
We say no to bad fits
If a rules engine, a better form or fixing the process solves it cheaper, that is the recommendation you get.
HONEST
Questions

What decision-makers ask first.

Does our data leave the company?

That is a decision you make, not a side effect. We can run open-weight models entirely on STOREWEB infrastructure so no document ever leaves EU-hosted servers, or use a commercial API under a data processing agreement with retention disabled. Whichever route you choose, we document exactly where each piece of data travels.

How long does a first project take?

A scoped pilot on a single workflow typically runs four to eight weeks: two weeks to define the task and assemble evaluation data, then iterations until the measured accuracy clears the threshold agreed in advance. We do not move a system into production before it beats the manual baseline on your own data.

What happens when the model gets it wrong?

Every system we deliver is designed around that assumption. Outputs carry confidence signals and source citations, low-confidence cases route to a human, and every decision is logged so errors can be traced and corrected. AI proposes; your process decides where a human must sign.

Do we need to prepare our data first?

Usually less than expected. Most useful projects start from documents and records you already hold — contracts, invoices, tickets, procedures, historical decisions. The discovery phase establishes what exists, what is usable and what has to be cleaned before it is worth training or indexing anything.

How does the EU AI Act affect our project?

It depends on the use case, and classification is part of our discovery work. Most business automation falls into low-risk categories with transparency obligations, while anything touching employment, credit or access to public services carries heavier documentation duties. We map your use case, and where obligations apply, the technical documentation is part of the deliverable.

Can you work alongside our existing IT team?

Yes, and it usually produces the better result. Your team knows the processes and the data; we bring the AI engineering and the operational infrastructure. Repository access, architecture decisions and documentation are shared from the first sprint.

Bring us the annoying process.

The best first conversation is not about AI at all — it is about the task that consumes hours every week and nobody enjoys. We respond within 48h with an honest read on whether AI is the right tool for it.

Discuss a use case Contact form